37 issues in, and I can count on one hand the weeks where the entire software industry rearranged itself in 72 hours. This is one of them. Between Thursday and Saturday, two frontier labs turned your Mac into an AI operator, a Sofia holding told the market it's hiring a thousand digital employees by December, and somewhere in between, the question "who works here?" stopped having a clean answer.

If you manage a team, price a project, or run a P&L, read to the end of Story Two. The economics you built your 2026 plan around shifted this week.

For two years the race between Anthropic and OpenAI played out inside your editor. Cursor, Claude Code, Copilot, Windsurf all fought for the same real estate: the file tree and the chat panel.

On Thursday Anthropic shipped Claude Opus 4.7 alongside a rebuilt Claude Code desktop app and a feature called Routines, saved bundles of prompt, repo, and connector that run on Anthropic's cloud on a schedule. Twenty-four hours later OpenAI answered with a Codex that drives your entire Mac cursor, ships with 90+ plugins, and spins up parallel agents across applications.

The positional shift is the real story. When the AI lives inside the editor it's a tool. When it drives the mouse, reads the screen, opens your browser, and pastes into Figma on its own, it is the layer your operating system used to be.

Every founder running Cursor last week thought they were paying for a better IDE. This week they bought a competitor to macOS. For the solo operator, that means your internal cron jobs, your Zapier flows, and half your calendar can run on an Anthropic or OpenAI account while you sleep. For the mid-size team, the roles you hired in 2024 to glue the tools together now compete with a $200 subscription that never forgets a context.

I don't think either lab planned to ship two OS-layer updates the same week. The fact that they did, tells you the race has moved past the model and onto the chair. Whoever owns the chair owns the workflow, and whoever owns the workflow captures the margin.

Watch for Microsoft's response at Build in May. If Copilot stays inside Word and Excel while Claude and ChatGPT take the desktop, the Office franchise quietly slides from productivity suite to legacy app.

Your current trading platform is probably letting you down

Liquid is one of the fastest growing trading platforms, allowing users to trade stocks, commodities, FX, and more 24/7/365 from their phone and computer.

Trading on Liquid is as simple as:

The best part is that Liquid markets never close. So no matter what is going on in the world, you are able to keep your portfolio positioned properly.

Start trading 24/7 today

While the Valley shipped the tools, Southeast Europe booked them as headcount. On April 17, Bulgarian automation holding Codery acquired Sofia-based RPA shop Elfshock and rebranded it Codery Automations. The deal itself is not the headline. What matters is the line in the post-announcement reporting: Codery, backed by Silverline Capital, told the market it plans to end 2026 with 200 human employees and 1,000 digital ones.

This is the first CEE company I've seen price digital headcount into a press release the way a consultancy prices billable hours. American CEOs talk about this on podcasts. A Bulgarian holding is putting it on a term sheet, naming the number, and signing acquisitions to get there faster.

Founder Nikolay Hristov kept 20% of Elfshock and took the CIO seat. Codery has three more acquisitions and a funding round telegraphed for later this year. If the plan lands, by January Codery will have the lowest per-employee overhead of any professional services firm in Southeast Europe, and the cost of running an RPA or AI-agent department in Plovdiv, Skopje, or Belgrade drops alongside it.

Two things to sit with.

First, the margin compression. If Codery Automations delivers what a 300-person consultancy used to deliver with 50 humans and a fleet of agents, the rest of the regional professional services market has 12 months to either follow or shrink.

Second, the accounting problem. A "digital employee" is a subscription expense, not headcount. Every operational metric that benchmarks a company on revenue-per-employee is about to read Codery as a miracle, and every other SEE company as slow.

The question at the next board meeting is not "should we add AI agents." It's which line on your P&L you report them under when the market asks.

The same week a Sofia holding telegraphed 1,000 digital hires, Menlo Park telegraphed 8,000 firings. Reuters confirmed on Friday that Meta will execute its largest layoff in company history on May 20, cutting roughly 10% of global headcount with leadership openly targeting "middle management and roles that can be augmented by AI."

More waves are scheduled for later in the year. Meta is doing this from a $200 billion revenue, $60 billion profit position while spending $135 billion on AI capex this year.

This is not a distress cut. This is the Zuckerberg "fewer management layers" doctrine going operational, and it is the cleanest paired example you'll get of the labor market splitting into two lines: the people building autonomous workflows on one side, the people whose roles those workflows replace on the other.

The same dollar that funds an Anthropic Routine in the first part of the newsletter is the dollar that pays a Meta engineer the company decides it no longer needs in May. Across Cerebras (filing for a $22-25 billion IPO on Friday), Anthropic (turning down term sheets at $800 billion), and Oracle (announcing 30,000 cuts with 12,000 in India to free $8-10 billion for GPUs), the capital is all moving the same direction: out of human coordination and into automated execution.

If you run a team in Europe right now, three concrete moves before the end of Q2. First, audit your org chart for roles that "coordinate" versus roles that "create", coordination is the cut line, and the people doing it deserve to know now, not in November.

Second, reconcile your 2026 AI capex assumption against your headcount budget. If the ratio looks like 2024, your model is wrong. Third, watch which of your competitors quietly thin their middle while keeping their producers. That's the move you're going to be asked to defend at your next board meeting.

On April 16 in Middelburg, Zelensky and Dutch Prime Minister Rob Jetten signed a joint declaration launching the Ukraine-Netherlands Drone Deal: €248 million ($292 million) for joint production of drones, missiles, and electronic warfare kit, manufactured on both sides of the border.

Within hours, the Russian Ministry of Defence published the names and addresses of European drone suppliers it now considers "potential targets." The list includes Lithuanian, Latvian, and Estonian SMEs that, between September 2025 and April 2026, shipped over 17,000 UAV components to Ukraine.

The Middelburg deal is what defense sovereignty looks like when it stops being a Brussels white paper and becomes a bilateral wire transfer with manufacturing clauses. Combat-tested Ukrainian IP is now an asset class European governments are buying.

The structure is novel: Ukraine contributes the design and the combat data, the partner co-manufactures and co-finances, both sides keep the IP. The Baltic suppliers Russia named are the next tier down, the small and mid-sized regional manufacturers actually building the supply chain Brussels keeps writing strategies about.

For CEE governments and defense ministers, this deal is a template. Croatia's Orqa already runs a version of it with General Cherry; expect Polish, Czech, and Romanian defense ministries to sign their own variants before the end of Q3.

For founders and investors, the implication is more pointed: defense tech in CEE is no longer a niche thesis with three buyers and a 24-month sales cycle. It is the only sector in the region where the buyer is publicly committed, the budget is rising on a multi-year basis, and the regulatory tailwind is structural.

Four picks worth your attention, each readable in under a minute.

Anthropic Claude Design. Shipped Friday on Opus 4.7. Reads your codebase and design system, then exports decks, one-pagers, and prototypes to PDF, PPTX, or Canva. If you've been paying for a freelance designer to update slides in your brand template, that line item is now a subscription. Try it on your next pitch deck.

You can use my invitation link here to get free week of Claude Cowork.

OpenAI GPT-Rosalind. OpenAI's first vertical frontier model. Trained on 50 core biology workflows with the major public bio databases wired in, currently in trusted-access with Amgen, Moderna, the Allen Institute, and Thermo Fisher. Beat GPT-5.4 on 6 of 11 LABBench2 research tasks. Worth flagging to anyone in your network building biotech or healthtech in Czechia, Slovenia, or Estonia. OpenAI's announcement.

Hermes Agent v0.8.0. Open-source self-improving agent at 65,000 GitHub stars this week. Runs across Telegram, Discord, Slack, WhatsApp, Signal, and CLI from one gateway. Model-agnostic, uses ICLR 2026's GEPA paper to auto-refine its own prompts. Use it if you want to build your own agent stack without locking into one lab's ecosystem. Repo on GitHub.

Gemini Robotics-ER 1.6. Google DeepMind's new robotics reasoning model now reads physical instruments like pressure gauges, courtesy of a Boston Dynamics collaboration. It calls Google Search when a robot gets confused mid-task. Embodied AI stopped being a demo this week and started being an API. DeepMind's writeup.

Thanks for making it to the end! I put my hard work and dedication into every email I send, I hope you are enjoying it.

Btw if you want to get your brand in front of a fast-growing audience of founders, investors, innovators, and tech professionals from South-East Europe all the way to Europe and the US, Signal connects the dots between local and global opportunities, and your message can be part of the story. Send an email at [email protected].

See you on the next edition,
Çelik